Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Packers and Stockyards Act

The Packers and Stockyards Act is in the news in two ways: In September, a coalition of groups that advocate for small farms signed onto Wheeler v. Pilgrim's Pride brief. The Fifth Circuit Court ruled that producers do not have to show that poultry (or beef or pork) companies actions have an adverse effect on competition. NFFC signed onto this brief. Also, the DOJ and USDA have announced public workshops in 5 cities in the US in 2010 on legal issues surrounding competition in agricultural. One of these workshops deals with the PSA


Packers and Stockyards Act (1921)

National Agricultural Law Center Reading Room: Packers and Stockyards Act

PSA Overview PDF (2003)

GAO PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS PROGRAMS Actions Needed to Improve Investigations of Competitive Practices PDF (2000)


Packers and Stockyards Act: A Sword in a Stone

Contract Agriculture Reform (RAFI)

Wheeler v. Pilgrim’s Pride Brief Filed

More Research (11/29/09)




Food Safety Reading

Here are some links for information about the Food Safety bill set to begin debate in the Senate. With Healthcare legislation dominating the agenda, it is unlikely that the Senate will take up further work on this bill until next year.

S. 510 Food Safety and Modernization Act

Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund

Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Food Safety News

Berea farmer revives the land

Berea farmer revives the land

By Susan Smith-Durisek
Contributing Garden Writer

Susana Lein's bountiful harvest this year was gathered from her gardens and fields at Salamander Springs Farm, in the mountains south of Berea.

Through sustainable agricultural practices, this ridgetop farm flourishes on marginal land that had been depleted of topsoil and had no existing infrastructure.

Since 2001, Lein has used the principles of permaculture to build the farm and buildings from scratch and produce non-mechanized, no-till corn for ground corn meal, popcorn, dry beans (pinto and black turtle), and a diverse supply of local and organic produce including garlic, onions, squash, herbs, flowers, and year-round greens and root crops.

Lein grew up on a small farm in Iowa in the 1960s and '70s before the farm crisis changed the agricultural landscape.

"The farm community in which I grew up no longer exists," she said. "Huge-scale production of commodity corn and soybeans, and enormous hog factories have replaced smaller, diversified farms. Semi-trailers and giant machinery dominate the landscape. Former farmers now drive miles to work in 'rural development' factories. I was one of a new category of exports of the early '80s — our educated young."

After college, Lein worked almost seven years as a landscape architect and planner in Boston. She began to manage large projects for her firm.

"I recognized my role in paving over the land with unsustainable development and realized that my work in life must support my spiritual values and not be separate from it," she said.

After that, she spent weekends learning about permaculture and sustainable design at the New Alchemy Institute on Cape Cod, Mass., and reading works by E.F. Schumacher, Helen and Scott Nearing, and Wendell Berry that agreed with her new philosophy.

Wanting to use her skills to serve others, she left Boston in 1991 and lived seven years in Guatemala, where she worked with a non-profit organization, Altertec, helping campesino farmers implement permaculture practices while building well pumps, wood-cooking stoves, composting latrines and other technologies.

"I learned the joy of living more simply with less resources," she said. "My life was enriched by people grounded in the land. I saw how their poverty and oppression stem from the economic system we support here in America with our dollars.

"We've removed ourselves from the responsibility for how and where our food and resources come to us — and at what cost."

Lein returned to the States to work toward change at the source of the problem. A change from petroleum-based agriculture, she says, is imminent.

"The food Americans eat uses more petroleum to produce and get to their table than it takes to run their cars or heat their houses," she said.

Combining "permanent" and "agriculture," permaculture employs principles and methods to develop systems that mimic patterns and relationships found in nature to yield food, fiber, housing and energy for local needs.

Natural ecosystems serve as models, teaching how to develop energy-sustaining connections between resources and users.

Salamander Springs Farm mimics natural systems by not tilling but building the soil up with compost, cover crops and mulch. The soil is kept covered to protect organic matter from erosion and discourages weeds from doing that job. Earthworms improve soil structure and make tilling unnecessary.

Diverse crops are grown intensively, unlike large mono cultures with rows of bare soil. Water, energy and nutrients are recycled. Crops and elements of the farm perform multiple functions and create symbiotic relationships: In Lein's orchard, the tap roots of comfrey, an herb used in salves, loosen clay soil while creating a weed barrier around the root zones of fruit trees.

Lein walks her talk. With limited financial resources, she has made marginal land into a thriving ecosystem and has moved from a tent into a solar-powered, spring water-fed home.

The home and outbuildings were built using recycled and salvaged materials and wood from the farm that was logged with human and horse power. Solar power is used for drying and home energy, and water is supplied from a natural spring box via a gravity-fed water line, and it's supplemented by roof-water collection systems.

Lein's no-till dry bean field was inspired by Japanese rice farmer Masanobu Fukuoka's book, The Natural Way of Farming. Bean production per acre is more than twice that of a conventional field, which requires wide rows for tractor tillage. Garlic and onion production is almost four times that of conventional fields, with no petroleum consumed, she said.

Lein teaches at seminars across the country and at the farm through workshops and apprenticeship programs.

She sees two kinds of poverty in the world, she said, and she works to alleviate both. The first, she said, is economic poverty. The second is a poverty of spirit, a deep longing in people who have access to resources but want to reconnect with the source of our sustenance.

"We lost our commitment to creation," she said. "We need to become partners and work to become closer to the land."

Reach master gardener Susan Smith-Durisek at durisek@aol.com.

Kentucky invests $1.2 million in farm projects

FRANKFORT, Ky. — Farmers in several counties will be able to tap into more than $1.2 million set aside for agricultural investments.

The Kentucky Agricultural Development Board approved the money last week.

The Boyle County Farm Bureau will receive $324,000, the largest single amount announced. The Washington County Cattlemen Association will receive $315,000, followed by the Todd County Conservation District that received $300,000.

The money will go to farmers primarily for agricultural diversification projects.

Farmers may get new chance for energy funds

By LIZ SWITZER, The Daily News, lswitzer@bgdailynews.com

Farm producers who missed out on federal energy stimulus funds in 2009 may get another chance to qualify in 2010 through the On-farm Energy Efficiency and Production investment area of the Kentucky Agricultural Development Fund’s County Agricultural Investment Program.

The energy efficiency incentive - lauded by state agricultural policymakers as a means for farmers to boost their bottom lines as energy costs rise - will be open to agricultural producers in all Kentucky counties in 2010 with any funds that remain from the 2009 sign-up, which ended Nov. 13.

Another application period is likely in late February or early March, said Bryan Thomas, compliance specialist with the Governor’s Office of Agricultural Policy in Frankfort.

“It is a given that our energy costs are going to continue to go up, and the sooner farmers can adopt some of these energy-efficient practices, the quicker they will get the return on it,” Thomas said. “And it helps our utility providers. If we can lower the overall demand for energy, then they don’t have to build new power plants that put so much strain on the existing infrastructure.”

Through the cost-share program, many energy upgrades are likely to pay for themselves in one to two years in energy savings, but if a farmer has to initially make a choice to fund such items on an individual basis, the choice is more likely to be a quicker pay-back item instead of an energy-efficient choice, said Timothy D. Hughes, GOAP senior policy analyst.

“The advantages of the program are that it helps the individual producer to move in a direction to make decisions on energy efficiency that they would not do otherwise,” Hughes said. “It provides them with the incentive to do that at the on-farm level.”

On-farm Energy Efficiency and Production is one of the 11 investment areas under the County Agricultural Investment Program, which offers assistance to agriculture producers for energy efficiency in farm operations, production of biomass crops or production of alternative energy for on-farm use.

Gov. Steve Beshear announced in September that more than $2 million in stimulus funds would be available to Kentucky agriculture under the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act for on-farm energy conservation, renewable energy production and regional renewable fuel projects.

As a result of a partnership between the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet and the Governor’s Office of Agricultural Policy, two energy-related programs are being implemented using federal stimulus funds.

A portion of the funds will provide a variety of opportunities for Kentucky farm families to increase farm energy efficiency and renewable fuel production, working in tandem with the On-farm Energy Efficiency and Production area of CAIP.

The remaining portion is earmarked for a Multi-county Collaborative Agricultural Energy Initiatives Program and will be used to complement tobacco settlement funds for grants to multicounty collaborations in order to enhance and advance renewable energy production at the farm level. Funding will be made available there for energy efficiency applications and renewable energy production.

“These are the type of investments that will make a farmer money long term,” Thomas said. “A lot of times we think it may cost a lot of money to do something, but we are finding that some of these are very inexpensive type upgrades so we want to get farmers thinking about making some of these investments.”

Sam Lawson, a Kentucky Agricultural Development Board member from Warren County, said: “The farmers out here are pretty creative. Give them a little bit of support and a little guidance and there is going to be a whole shopping list of ideas to get them started, from solar panels on their barn facilities to some wind opportunities.”

Energy stimulus incentives provide 25 percent reimbursement of the actual cost of a federally qualified energy saving item, up to $10,000. Permissible items include, but are not limited to, energy audits, energy efficient farm building components, on-farm energy upgrades and on-farm energy efficiency training.

All applications received from across the commonwealth will be reviewed and scored by a committee composed of representatives from GOAP, the Kentucky Agricultural Development Board, the UK College of Agriculture and a Rural Electric Cooperative.

— Questions about the application process may be directed to Bryan Thomas at (502) 564-4627 or bryan.thomas@ky.gov.

Friday, November 20, 2009

'Timing is right' for hemp, state senator says

Bill would promote plant's use for fuel and fiber

By Valarie Honeycutt Spears
vhoneycutt@herald-leader.com

Within the next three weeks, State Sen. Joey Pendleton plans to take a group of Kentucky farmers to study the industrial hemp trade in Canada where the crop has been grown legally for the past 10 years.

Pendleton, D-Hopkinsville, has introduced a bill for 2010, renewing a push to legalize industrial hemp in Kentucky as a cash crop and as a source for alternative fuels.

"The timing is right," Pendleton said. "It would give farmers another crop to raise." Production of hemp is already legal for research purposes in Kentucky but is untried due to federal barriers.

Pendleton's bill comes at a time when federal legislation decriminalizing hemp for industrial use has been introduced in Congress and proponents are encouraged by stances taken by the Obama Administration.

In Versailles, where the remnants of an old hemp processing plant still stand on property that Margaret McCauley's family owns, McCauley said she hopes Pendleton is successful.

"I think industrial hemp would do a lot for the farming community," said McCauley, who has preserved artifacts from decades ago when hemp was grown legally in Kentucky.

McCauley said she hopes lawmakers won't confuse industrial hemp with its controversial cousin, marijuana.

Although industrial hemp comes from the same plant species as marijuana, industrial hemp does not have enough THC, the psychoactive chemical in marijuana, to produce the "high" marijuana users feel, proponents say. Hemp and marijuana look alike. But hemp is grown for fiber found in the stalk while marijuana is grown for leaves and flower buds.

Industrial hemp is used in alternative automobile fuels and in such products as paper, cloths, cosmetics, and carpet.

Pendleton's bill would require that individuals wanting to grow or process industrial hemp be licensed by the state Department of Agriculture. The legislation would require criminal history checks of growers and would require sheriffs to monitor and randomly test industrial hemp fields.

The bill calls for an assessment fee of $5 per acre for every acre of industrial hemp grown, with a minimum fee of $150, to be divided equally between the state and the appropriate sheriff's department.

Phillip Garnett, a Christian County farmer, said he plans to go to Canada with Pendleton to investigate industrial hemp farming as a potential "new source of income and energy." Pendleton said he'd pay for his portion of the trip.

Garnett who raises tobacco, corn, wheat, and soybeans, said he wants to know more about the economics before he would consider raising industrial hemp. But he said "I'm always looking for alternative crops, and it sounds like it makes sense."

Because of current federal law, all hemp included in products sold in the United States must be imported.

Federal law includes industrial hemp in the definition of marijuana, and prohibits American farmers from growing hemp.

But the Industrial Hemp Farming Act, introduced in Congress in April by Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Texas, would require the federal government to respect state laws allowing hemp production.

Pendleton says he sees new hope that federal barriers will be lessened, pointing to positions taken by the Obama administration.

In February, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said the federal government was going to yield medical marijuana jurisdiction to states. As a state lawmaker in Illinois, Barack Obama voted for a resolution urging Congress to allow the production of industrial hemp.

In addition to production of hemp, research on hemp has been affected. A federal permit is required for industrial hemp research, Laura E. Sweeney, a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Justice, said Friday.

The University of Kentucky would probably grow industrial hemp for research if allowed in the future, said Scott Smith, dean of the UK College of Agriculture.

When UK applied for a federal permit to grow a research plot of industrial hemp after Kentucky passed the 2001 law allowing analysis, the federal government denied permission, Smith said.

Kentucky is one of eight states that allows hemp research or production.

The federal government has given North Dakota State University permission to grow industrial hemp for research purposes under strict security measures, but money has been an issue.

In Kentucky, a similar bill filed in the 2009 General Assembly by Pendleton was not given a hearing.

But for 2010, state State Sen. David P. Givens, R-Greensburg, the chair of the Senate Agricultural Committee, said he is interested in seeing new economic studies.

The most prominent studies on the profitability of industrialized hemp in Kentucky are a decade old. They reached conflicting conclusions.

A study released in 1998 included work by researchers at UK's Center for Business and Economic Research. It showed that had hemp production been legalized at that time, Kentucky would have benefitted, with farmers making profits of between $220 and $605 an acre.

The returns would have fallen somewhere between tobacco and other crops that were already grown in Kentucky, the research showed.

However, a study released in 1997 by the UK College of Agriculture did not find much of a market for Kentucky hemp.

Smith, who served on an industrial hemp study commission convened by then Gov. Brereton Jones in the 1990s, remains skeptical of the potential profits from hemp.

Givens said he is also interested in hearing from law enforcement officials, who have expressed misgivings in the past.

Christian County Sheriff Livy Leavell Jr. said additional revenue for sheriff's departments "would be a plus" and that he hoped members of the Kentucky Sheriff's Association would take a close look at the legislation.

Reach Valarie Honeycutt Spears at (859) 231-3409 or 1-800-950-6397, ext. 3409

Workshops to Focus on Ag Competition

By Pork news source (11/19/2009)

The U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division and the USDA will hold a series of joint public workshops to explore competition issues affecting the agricultural sector in the 21st century and the appropriate role for antitrust and regulatory enforcement in that industry. The first workshop will be held in early 2010.

These are the first joint DOJ/USDA workshops ever to be held to discuss competition and regulatory issues in the agriculture industry. The goals of the workshops are to promote dialogue among interested parties and foster learning with respect to the appropriate legal and economic analyses of these issues.

The workshops will address the dynamics of competition in agriculture markets, including buyer power and vertical integration. They will examine legal doctrines and jurisprudence, as well as current economic learning, and will provide an opportunity for farmers, ranchers, consumer groups, processors, agribusiness, and other interested parties to provide examples of potentially anticompetitive conduct and to discuss any concerns about the application of the antitrust laws to the agricultural sectors.

Topics that will be covered during the workshops include the following:

• Application of antitrust laws to monopsony and vertical integration in the agricultural sector, including the scope, functionality, and limits of current or potential rules
• Impact of agriculture concentration on food costs
• The effect of agricultural regulatory statutes or other applicable laws and programs on competition
• Issues relating to patents and intellectual property affecting agricultural marketing or production
• Market practices such as:

o Price spreads
o Forward contracts
o Packer ownership of livestock before slaughter
o Market transparency
o Increasing retailer concentration

The 2010 schedule and topics are:

• March 12, in Ankeny, Iowa — Issues of Concern to Crop Farmers. Will focus on seed technology, vertical integration, market transparency and buyer power.
• May 21, in Normal, Ala. — Poultry Industry. Production contracts will be a major focus. In addition, they will look at concentration and buyer power.
• June 7, in Madison, Wis. — Dairy Industry. The focus may include concentration, marketplace transparency and vertical integration.
• August 26, in Fort Collins, Colo. — Livestock Industry. The session will address beef, hog and other animal sectors and may include enforcement activities of the Packers and Stockyards Act as well as a discussion of concentration.
• December 8, in Washington, DC — Will look at “discrepancies” between the prices received by farmers and the prices paid by consumers.

More information

Food Safety Bill Clears Senate Committee

Food Safety News

The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, a bill that would greatly increase the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's authority and mandate over the food system, was unanimously voted out of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee yesterday, nine months after Dick Durbin (D-IL) introduced the measure.

Groups in support of the legislation hailed the committee's action and continued to press the Senate to vote on the bill before the end of the year.

"This is another milestone on the path to fixing our badly-broken system for food safety," said Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union, the non-profit publisher of Consumer Reports. "The Senate bill was passed unanimously by committee members on both sides of the political aisle. The bipartisan support for this bill is strong, and momentum is building."

"I'm feeling extremely positive that ultimately this ended up being a bipartisan issue, which is what it should be," said Donna Rosenbaum, executive director of Safe Tables Our Priority (S.T.O.P.).

"We're going into the holiday season with great hopes that this is moving along and will be enacted as soon as possible," added Rosenbaum.

Though the version of the legislation that cleared the HELP committee enjoyed bipartisan support yesterday, there still remain issues to be resolved on the floor and eventually in conference committee. The House version of FDA food safety reform contains some differences--most notably the House bill would impose fees on food facilities to help fund the FDA's food safety inspection efforts, the Senate version does not.

Small and sustainable agriculture groups also still have concerns about the legislation's potential impact on farms, though advocates were pleased with progress made in the markup session.

The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) organized small and mid-sized farmers to press for changes to the bill over the past several days, and their efforts proved fruitful. NSAC was pleased with the new version of the legislation--which was Senator Tom Harkin's (D-IA) substitute amendment. Harkin is a longtime proponent of the agriculture community.

NSAC believes the changes made to the bill respond to concerns over farm scale, crop diversity, conservation and organic conflicts and are "a step in the right direction" but the group still has major concerns.

NSAC wants the FDA to be more explicit about how much new regulations would impact farmers. "The Food and Drug Administration believes that tens of thousands of farms are affected by the bill's provisions," said Fred Hoefner, policy director for NSAC. "We have good reason to believe it is hundreds of thousands with more to come as farmers respond to consumer demand for high quality, value-added local and regional food."

"It behooves the Senate to get an answer to this very basic question before finishing the legislative process," said Hoefner.

NSAC is also continuing to press for the Senate to add the Growing Safe Food Act (S.2758) to the food safety bill to help alleviate the impact of food safety compliance on small and mid-sized farmers. S. 2758, recently introduced by Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), would provide funding and educational programs to help educate and train farmers and food processors, "We will continue to push for its inclusion as the bill moves to the Senate floor," said Hoefner.

50-mile meal highlights food grown locally

Last modified: Friday, October 30, 2009 11:44 AM CDT

50-mile meal highlights food grown locally

By JENNA MINK, The Daily News, jmink@bgdailynews.com/783-3246

When Diana Giraldo started working on a class project, she was surprised to find the number of local people who grow and sell food.

“I had no idea there were all these things,” said Giraldo, a senior hospitality management major at Western Kentucky University. “We don’t buy a whole lot of groceries; college students don’t normally eat that well, anyway.”

Giraldo and her classmates hosted a 50-mile meal Thursday at WKU’s Academic Complex - students cooked and served lunch to about 54 faculty and community members, using products that were grown within 50 miles of Bowling Green.

“I think it’s a really good idea,” said Jenny Dargan, a senior hospitality management major. “It’s awesome in today’s economy how we’re helping the community.”

As part of a class in the hotel, restaurant and tourism management program, students serve a meal each week, which helps them get real-world experience in the restaurant field. But this week was different. Their professor, Rich Patterson, asked them to get out of their comfort zones and cook a local meal.

“I think it’s real important for students to know that we need to support our community,” he said.

Patterson assigned the locally themed project after Cynthia D. Sprouse, treasurer of BG Green, suggested it. Last year, Sprouse helped organize a similar dinner at Verdi Restaurant.

“During the summer, there’s limited places to eat on campus,” she said. “However, we have the farmers market going on. The homegrown, in the long run, is going to be healthier than the grocery store.”

Students chose a meal and began researching places to purchase ingredients. They visited local farmers markets and contacted local producers and farmers, dropping by places like Jackson’s Orchard. Thursday afternoon, students were dressed in waiter and chef garb, cooking and serving plates of local meats, fruits and vegetables.

“I had heard (about farmers markets) on the radio, but actually going out and talking to people, I had never seen them,” Giraldo said. “Now that I know it’s here, I want to go more.”

And some diners said they hoped the 50-mile meal generated that kind of awareness.

“I think it’s a really good attempt at getting local ideas on campus,” said Molly Kerby, assistant professor of women’s studies. “I’m seeing some people I wouldn’t expect to be here.”

Kerby is co-owner of Greener Groundz Coffee and Cafe, a local restaurant that often uses local produce and promotes shopping and eating locally.

“It’s more ethically beneficial,” she said. “It sends a message to buy local.”

Patterson said preparing locally grown food is not yet a trend among restaurants, “but it’s catching on more and more.”

Jeanie Adams-Smith, associate professor of photojournalism, said she’s been trying to eat mostly local foods since March.

“I feel a difference in how I feel. The food is just better,” she said. “I try to get as much locally grown as I can.”

Still, eating locally requires a commitment from most people, she said.

“It’s a lot of work,” she said. “You have to research who’s doing this, and you have to ask the questions.”

WKU students were asking those questions this week and more will search for local farmers in the future - Patterson said he plans to continue the 50-mile project and he will likely offer the meal twice next semester.

“Your produce is so much better when it’s fresh,” he said. “Plus, we’re supporting the local community.”

UK, KSU get grant to educate new farmers

Source: Smiley Pete Publishing

UK, KSU get grant to educate new farmers

by Margaret Buranen

November 17, 2009

LEXINGTON, KY - Even city dwellers know that farming is a tough way to make a living. It’s tough to hang onto a farm that’s been in the family for generations, or to start farming without an agricultural background. Add an uncertain economy and it’s no wonder that the number of people who work in farming has been steadily declining.

That trend may reverse a bit in Kentucky, where new farmers and would-be farmers will be getting a helping hand, beginning early in the new year. The state’s two land grant schools, the University of Kentucky and Kentucky State University, have been awarded a $750,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to train beginning farmers.

The USDA is funding the program at 29 universities and agricultural organizations. The result of a new USDA initiative “Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food,” it’s the first major program targeting new farmers.

“Beginning farmers and ranchers face unique challenges and need educational and training programs to enhance their profitability and long term sustainability,” said Deputy U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Kathleen Merrigan.

Merrigan said that such critical training “will help ensure the success of the next generation of farmers and ranchers as they work to feed people in their local communities and throughout the world.”

Kentucky’s new whole farm management education program, A Common Field, is a two-year course, offered in different areas of the state, including educational meetings at county extension offices and on-site farm demonstrations.

First year topics for A Common Field include evaluation of different crops and types of farms, land labor resources, nutrient management, farm record keeping, agriculture water quality plans and marketing.

During the second year participants will work with mentor farmers from groups such as Kentucky Women in Agriculture and the Kentucky Beef Network who have similar farming interests as class participants.

Principal investigators on the grant are Dr. A. Lee Meyer, extension professor, and Jennifer Hunter, extension associate in UK’s Department of Agricultural Economics. They are working with Dr. Harold Benson, director of the Land Grant Program at KSU.

“This is an opportunity for two institutions to bring together their resources for the betterment of a clientele that desperately needs good, unbiased research and support in these days of trail by fire,” Benson said of the program.

Hunter has received inquiries from county extension agents all across the state. She expects that A Common Field will be “a program that meets producer needs and responds to the diversity of Kentucky agriculture.”

A free online version of the curriculum is also being developed. This resource will be available to anyone and as a supplement for the program’s participants. “I really see that as one of the lasting legacies of this project,” Meyer said.

The cost to participate in the two-year program is $100. Participants must be high school graduates, but can be of any age. “We expect a significant portion of the participants to be farming for a second career,” Meyer said.

As for the number of participants in the program, Meyer said, “We plan on 10 multi-county clusters of about 30 each in each of the two cycles.”

The best part of the new program is “the opportunity to bring a diverse mix of new, energetic farmers into the sector,” Meyer said. “Young folks will bring creative new ideas and second career farmers will bring experiences and skills from their first careers. They’ll be resources to Kentucky rural communities, and add to the food products coming from Kentucky farms.”

Beginning farmers—defined by the USDA as those with ten or less years of experience in farming—should contact their county Cooperative Extension agents if they are interested in participating in A Common Field.

Judge rules W. Ky. hog farm permits need reworking

Judge rules W. Ky. hog farm permits need reworking

BY JAMES BRUGGERS JBRUGGERS@COURIER-JOURNAL.COM NOVEMBER 16, 2009

    A Franklin Circuit Court judge has determined that the environmental permits issued for as many as nine large Western Kentucky hog farms are illegal and need to be reworked by state regulators.
    Several of the farms are already operating under terms of their permits, first issued three years ago. And Judge Phillip Shepherd's ruling on Monday does not force any to shut down.
    But in his 28-page ruling, Shepherd wrote that the permits issued by the Energy and Environment Cabinet during the Fletcher administration failed to protect waterways and the public from excessive nutrients and pathogens and should have considered toxic air emissions.
    Shepherd also determined that the owner of the hogs – Tennessee-based Tosh Farms – must share liability for any pollution with the Kentucky farmers raising them.
    Shepherd said the agency, which he once ran, “failed to enforce its own regulatory requirements.”
    Cabinet spokesman Dick Brown declined to comment, saying officials were reviewing the ruling. Carolyn Brown, an attorney who represents the Kentucky hog farmers, also declined to answer questions, as did Jimmy Tosh, owner of Tosh Farms.
    “I can't comment on anything I don't know anything about,” Tosh said Monday afternoon. “I just got an email (about the ruling) a few minutes ago.”
    But one of the two lawyers who represented the 12 individuals who filed the lawsuit against the environmental cabinet said he was pleased with the ruling.
    “We argued these permits were illegal under Kentucky and federal law, and this judge has agreed,” said Midway attorney Hank Graddy Jr., who worked on the case with Tom FitzGerald, director of the Kentucky Resources Council. “That is helpful in my efforts to shut these facilities down.”
    At issue is how waste from tens of thousands of hogs is managed.
    The permits estimated that if all nine farms were operating at capacity, 45,000 hogs would produce as much as 16 million gallons of liquid waste per year. The farmers were allowed to sell the waste as fertilizer that could potentially get into waterways.
    Graddy and Brown agreed that six or seven of the nine farms constructed hog barns and were now operating under agreements with Tosh.
    But Monday's ruling also potentially affects as many as ten other large hog farms that were issued similar permits, Graddy said.
    Shepherd said the state should have required a type of water quality permit that allows greater public participation.
    He also said the permits didn't have any specific pathogen controls, despite evidence that pathogens are in hog manure. He added that the manure would emit air pollutants such as ammonia and hydrogen sulfide.
    Reporter James Bruggers can be reached at (502) 582-4645.

MCTC project could help Ky. farmers, energy producers

MCTC project could help Ky. farmers, energy producers



By MISTY MAYNARD, Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 18, 2009 1:15 AM EST
Taking their cue from a pilot project the University of Kentucky's College of Agriculture started, Maysville Community and Technical College plans to plant switchgrass on five acres of the campus to discover whether it might prove to be another way farmers can diversify their agricultural operations and be used as a biofuel for power plants.

East Kentucky Power Cooperative is partnering with UK in the pilot program and Carrie Taylor, associate professor and horticulture coordinator for Workforce Solutions at MCTC, said she hopes to sell the switchgrass harvested at MCTC to power plants like EKPC. Switchgrass is mixed with coal feedstock to fuel power plants.

Dennis Perry, instructional specialist for agriculture at the Rowan campus of the community college, actually suggested the project to Taylor. He said he learned of UK's project and decided that since there was so much space on the Maysville campus, it would be a good location for a similar project.

"The ultimate goal of this is to help create a new product that can be raised on farms," Perry said.



In addition to being used as a biofuel, switchgrass can be used as feed for livestock.

Diversification is important, Taylor said, especially in light of the changes to the tobacco industry. Farmers interested in trying switchgrass can visit the campus and learn about the crop and it's maintenance.

Taylor said switchgrass is a perennial native to Kentucky and relatively easy to maintain. She will monitor it for diseases, fungus and other potentially harmful factors with the assistance of inmates from the Mason County Detention Center. Those inmates are involved in a horticulture work program and take part in other projects as well.

Taylor endorsed the switchgrass project as something that engages many from the community, including farm supply companies and small business owners, which are often interconnected. They are working with the advisement of UK and partnering with extension offices, Taylor said.

Perry and Taylor were not sure how much five acres could yield or the price switchgrass could sell for.

Taylor said the switchgrass will be harvested likely after its second year when it is five to six feet tall. It will likely be planted in the spring and has a 20-year life cycle, Taylor said.


Contact Misty Maynard at misty.maynard@lee.net or call 606-564-9091, ext. 272.

State Ag Fund Faces Shortfall

Kentucky Post

November 11

FRANKFORT, Ky. – A state agriculture fund that has been used to fund water and sewer lines among other projects is facing a $9 million shortfall that could threaten the fund over the next few years, state lawmakers heard Tuesday.

Governor’s Office of Agricultural Policy (GOAP) Executive Director Roger Thomas told the Interim Joint Committee on Agriculture that money for state projects provided by the Agricultural Development Fund--financed by Kentucky’s share of a 1998 national tobacco settlement--is facing a $3 million shortfall in 2011 and $6 million shortfall in 2012. The deficit is due to prior commitments, debt service on projects like water and sewer lines and "other things that have been funded and paid for by the Agriculture Development Fund," Thomas said.

"That’s very troubling…for all of Kentucky, in my opinion," he said, adding he is hopeful the biennial budget passed during the upcoming 2010 Regular Session by state lawmakers will allow the fund to survive.

Thomas said most of the state-level funds provided by the ADF, which also funds county-level projects, go toward debt service on projects in most cases. Of $184 million in new debt service paid by the ADF in 2008, for example, Thomas said $150 million was for water and sewer projects. More needs to be done to protect those state funds, he explained.

"I think the state funds, the long-term investments, yes, the larger investments, will be the investments that change Kentucky agriculture over time," Thomas said.

Rep. Tom McKee, D-Cynthiana, who is Co-Chair of the committee, said it will be challenging for lawmakers to address the issue next session.

"Really, what I think has happened is the funding mechanism that we’ve used for other things has finally caught up with us," said McKee, adding that some things have to be changed.

Committee Co-Chair Sen. David Givens, R-Greensburg, also was concerned. "The trajectory is we’re going to continue on the path we’re headed on and we’re going to end up negative," he said. He asked Thomas about any threat to ADF moneys for county-level projects -- projects that some lawmakers say are more popular than state-level projects.

Thomas said Gov. Steve Beshear remains supportive of the ADF, and "…these are challenging times for everyone, so I appreciate that."

Rep. James Comer, R-Tompkinsville, said he is hopeful that ADF moneys can be protected as 2010 Regular Session budget talks evolve.

"We all know the importance of water and sewer projects but hopefully, if we do water and sewer projects, I just hope we stick together as a committee in a bipartisan way and not take any more money from the Agriculture Development Fund," he said.

The committee spent most of the meeting listening to legislative proposals for the 2010 Regular Session from different state agencies, universities and organizations including the GOAP, Kentucky Department of Agriculture, University of Kentucky, Kentucky State University, Kentucky Farm Bureau, Kentucky Agricultural Council and Murray State University.